The Federal Lawyer, a national magazine by the Federal Bar Association, just published an article by one of Parker Poe’s health care attorneys. The article looks at the implications of a recent Supreme Court decision and explores how Medicaid providers can still challenge rate cuts.
The article is available here.
Here is a common scenario: A behavioral healthcare provider has committed substantial resources into developing specialized behavioral healthcare services in the counties managed by a Managed Care Organization (“MCO”) under the Medicaid Waiver Program. The provider has a contract with the MCO to provide these services and has a good quality track record. Unexpectedly, the provider receives a letter from the MCO stating that the provider’s contract is being terminated – either because the provider’s contact is ending by its terms or because the MCO has decided to terminate the provider’s contract with 30 or 60 days’ notice. Question: Does the provider shut down its operations and transition its consumers, or does the provider have other options?
The simple answer: There are other options. Although some MCOs in North Carolina believe that the concept of a “closed network” allows them to eliminate providers when they choose to do so, there are many cases in which providers have successfully challenged those MCOs’ decisions.
Under North Carolina’s Medicaid laws, providers that receive adverse determinations from the Department’s contractors, including MCOs, have the right to a contested case hearing under the Administrative Procedure Act. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 108C-12. The venue for these hearings is the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”). Administrative Law Judges (“ALJs”) with OAH have presided over dozens of cases by providers challenging adverse decisions of MCOs. Adverse determinations made by MCOs can be reversed when those determinations violate law, are erroneous, arbitrary and capricious, or failed to use proper procedure. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-23(a). Some MCOs are completely ignoring the specific procedures that must be followed under State and federal law and regulations before deciding to eliminate a provider from their networks.
In numerous appeals to OAH that have been filed by providers, MCOs have argued unsuccessfully that the provisions in their contracts with providers or the law allowing them to operating “closed networks” permits them to terminate providers with no appeal rights. In one of those cases in which attorneys at Parker Poe represented the provider, the ALJ reversed the decision terminating the provider and the MCO appealed to Superior Court on the issue of whether the provider had the right to challenge the MCO’s decision. The Superior Court recognized the provider’s right to challenge the MCO’s decision. Yelverton’s Enrichment Services, Inc. v. PBH, 13 CVS 11337 (March 11, 2014).
In the Yelverton’s case, the Honorable Donald W. Stephens, Senior Resident Superior Court Judge in Wake County, concluded that contract provisions cannot override or negate the protections provided under North Carolina law, specifically the appeal rights set forth in North Carolina’s Medicaid law. In cases brought by providers since Judge Stephens’ decision, Administrative Law Judges have cited and relied upon that decision and have concluded that providers have the right to challenge an MCO’s decision to terminate or not renew a provider’s contract, notwithstanding the language in the provider’s contract.